Why Most Successful Business Models In 2025 Combine Multiple Archetypes

#93: 2.1 Pure Plays vs. Hybrids vs. Embedded Models

---

In Chapter 1, we mapped the five-layer stack of digital business models as systemic architectures. But layers are only one dimension. Another dimension is shape — the archetype a firm takes in how it creates, distributes, and captures value.

For years, strategy frameworks relied on clean categories: a SaaS firm, a marketplace, a payments processor. But by 2025, the real strategic edge lies in blending models.

• Pure plays give clarity and simplicity.

• Hybrids give compounding flywheels.

• Embedded models give scale without visibility.

The firms that dominate don’t pick one box — they orchestrate across them.

---

TL;DR: Pure, Hybrid, and Embedded—The Shapes That Win in 2025

• Shape matters: Beyond “layers,” the strategic edge in 2025 comes from the shape of your model—Pure Play, Hybrid, or Embedded.

• Pure Plays = focus and clarity but fragile: great unit economics, easy story, yet copyable and ceiling-prone.

• Hybrids = compounding flywheels: diversified revenue, cross-subsidies (e.g., AWS → Amazon retail), and data leverage—at the cost of organizational complexity.

• Embedded Models = invisible scale: API-first distribution and deep lock-in with low CAC, but dependency on platforms/infrastructure.

• Winning firms recombine shapes: Amazon, Shopify, Stripe, Anthropic blend pure, hybrid, and embedded elements to build resilient growth loops.

• Operate on four levers: Dependencies, Leverage Points, Compounding Flywheels, Orchestration Costs.

• Key takeaway: Focus alone is fragile; hybridization capacity is the moat.

---

Table of Contents

1. Strategic Insight: From Layers to Shapes

2. Why Shapes Matter in 2025

3. Pure Plays — Focused but Fragile

   • Definition & Advantages

   • Drawbacks

   • Examples: Zoom, Dropbox

   • Data Point: Pure-play SaaS margins & growth trends

4. Hybrids — The Compounding Flywheel

   • Definition & Advantages

   • Drawbacks

   • Examples: Amazon, Shopify

   • Data Point: Hybrid growth vs. pure-play SaaS

5. Embedded Models — Invisible Scale

   • Definition & Advantages

   • Drawbacks

   • Examples: Stripe, Anthropic

   • Data Point: API-first CAC vs. margin volatility

6. Why Hybrids (with Embedded Layers) Dominate

7. Operating Levers for Advantage

   • Dependencies (infra, distribution, monetization)

   • Leverage Points (cross-subsidies)

   • Compounding Flywheels (data → products → revenue)

   • Orchestration Costs (complexity tax)

8. Case Snapshots & Patterns

   • Amazon, Shopify, Stripe, Anthropic

9. Key Takeaway

10. References

---

1. Pure Plays — Focused but Fragile

Definition: A business operating through a single, well-defined model (e.g., SaaS subscription, e-commerce retailer).

Advantages:

• Sharp unit economics.

• Easy to communicate value to investors and users.

• Strong execution discipline (one product, one model).

Drawbacks:

• Vulnerable to copycats (Dropbox vs. Google Drive).

• Plateau risk when market saturates.

• No “second engine” to absorb shocks.

🔍 Examples:

• Zoom (2011–2019): Pure SaaS subscription with minimal monetization flexibility.

• Dropbox (pre-2016): Subscription storage without embedded ecosystem extensions.

📊 Data point: Pure-play SaaS firms in the Bessemer Cloud Index (2018–2021) averaged 40–50% YoY growth, but revenue diversification lagged. By 2023, median gross margins dropped from 75% → 69% as competition commoditized features.